Many proclaim cancer to be a
battle. Although it is analogous to it, the term “battle” in this case does not
only refer to a war-like scheme in which we have weapons to face the ultimate
enemy, cancer, in order to get better. It is a battle also in terms of staying motivated
to carry on with daily activities, to provide the needed provisions for
treatment, and to assure oneself that there is still hope in the eventual
dissipation of the illness. To “fight cancer” seems to be a ubiquitous term
when relating to patients. Upon reflection it seems proper to ask ourselves: if
cancer is within us, does it really make sense wage war on our own body? Aren’t
there better terms we can use than “to fight?” Along with the perspectives of
several cancer patients and expert scientists, the podcast “The Rhetoric of
Cancer” by BBC World Service analyzes this linguistic problem, among other
things such as the technologies being utilized today in treating patients, and
different ways to look at cancer as a whole.
Andrew Graystone, the narrator of
the podcast, was diagnosed with cancer over three years ago (as the podcast was
made recently, in November of 2013) and decided that he wanted to look for a
more appropriate term in dealing with his cancer, aside from militarized terms
such as “to fight” and “to battle.” In the realm of medical sciences, these
terms probably seemed more most fitting as the drugs that were are being
invented and studied often aim to find, isolate, and kill the cells responsible
for the spread of the cancer. However, as Andrew was the one who introduced the
cancer into his system, and as he was aware that the cancer was part of him, he
decided that terms of hostility would not be best to use when referring to his
own body. A devout Christian, he eventually turned to a good friend and
theologian, Paula Gooder, asking for her views on the matter. Her side is what
struck me most. She remarks that with cancer, perhaps it is better not to look
at it as a war of good and evil, but rather, as a reminder of the reality of
imminent death in our lives. We are all bound to die eventually – some sooner
than others. This is why we live with concepts of morality and justice, and we
aim to live life to the fullest.
In the end, Andrew remarks that
although he wants his cancer gone, he is not hostile towards it – he simply
wants to “kiss his cancer goodbye.” If there’s anything to be taken away from
this 25-minute podcast, I believe it is that we should treat cancer patients
not as people going through wars and struggles, but as people going through a
process of rediscovering themselves and coming to terms with what’s going on in
their own bodies. Cancer is not to be fought, it is simply to be removed.
Redd Claudio
2013-59776